OPINION - FROM PHILOSOPHY TO PSYCHOLOGY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5937/Keywords:
thinking, psychology, philosophyAbstract
A very brief overview of the definition of several philosophers according to the concept of opinion - Jaspers, Heidegger, Popper and Rorty and initially given views of Freud and Darwin as arche in relation to biological and psychological, ie, philosophical setting of the problem of opinion. Cognitive, comprehensive, instrumental, emotional, social, humanistic, technical, logical, poetic function are just some of the prerequisites for thinking about opinion
Downloads
References
1. Darvin, Č. (2009). Postanak vrsta: putem prirodnog odabiranja ili očuvanje povlašćenih rasa u borbi za život. Novi Sad: Akademska knjiga.
2. Frojd, S. (2006). Kompletan uvod u psihoanalizu. Podgorica: Nova knjiga.
3. Frojd, S. (2015). Nacrt psihoanalize. Beograd: Nova knjiga plus; Podgorica: Nova knjiga.
4. Хајдегер, М. (1999). Предавања и расправе. Београд: Плато.
5. Јасперс, К. (2000). Ум и егзистенција. Београд: Плато.
6. Попер, К. (2002a). Претпоставке и побијања: раст научног знања. Сремски Карловци, Нови Сад: Издавачка књижарница Зорана Стојановића.
7. Poper, K. (2002b). Objektivno saznanje. Beograd: PAIDEIA; Podgorica: CID.
8. Rorti, R. (1992). Konsekvence pragmatizma. Beograd: Nolit.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 The Methodology Theory and Practice

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.