CONTROVERSIAL DISCUSSION FOR IMPROVEMENT GEOGRAPHY TEACHING

Authors

  • Božidar Lazić doctoral student at the Faculty of Geography, University of Belgrade Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5937/

Keywords:

controversial discussion, group work, opposing topics, argumentative discussion

Abstract

Beside earning factually and logical knowledge, insight into casual-ensuing relations between objects and phenomenons, it is necessary that pupils develop some skills during pedagogical-educational process. Children’s cooperation in dealing with group tasks is very important from school aspects. Educational aspect means that they are taught by their coevals at the same time as they transfer knowledge to them, which is required for achieving goals. On the other hand, pedagogical part consists of earning motivation, sense of belonging to a group, sense of own significance and contribution to group success, but it also includes obstacles which pupils must manage. All that have been mentioned belongs to special concept in schooling, named controversial discussion. The name itself indicates the basic characteristics of concept – analysis certain controversial topic (actual and traditional) on classes, defense and criticism of standpoint. The best results using this kind of work are achieved by rotation of roles, more precisely in the end of first debate pupils that defended one standpoint, the second part of debate start to support standpoint they criticized before. Debate must be based on scientific arguments and acquired experiences, without one-sided expression.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Живковић, Љ., Јовановић, С. и Рудић, В. (2015). Методика наставе географије. Београд: Српско географско друштво.

2. Awan, S. (2014). Teaching controversial issues in the classroom: a handbook for teachers. Sacramento: California State University.

3. Busey, C. and Mooney, E. (2015). Controversy and social studies teacher education. Learning with and from students: twenty examples. Volume 6, editor Pec S.

4. Fournier-Sylvester, N. (2013). Daring to debate: strategies for teaching controversial issues in the classroom. College Quarterly, 16 (3).

5. Hand, M. and Levinson, R. (2012). Discussing controversial issues in the classroom. Educational philosophy and theory, vol. 44, No. 6.

6. Harwood, A. and Hahn, C. (1990). Controversial issues in the classroom. ERIC Clearinghouse for social studies/Social science education Bloomington IN.

7. Oxfam (2006). Global citizenship guides: Teaching controversial issues. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxfam House.

8. Kuş, Z. and Öztürk, D. (2019). Social studies teachers’ opinions and practices regarding teaching controversial issues. Australian journal of teacher education, 44 (8).

9. Roeders, P. (2003). Интерактивна настава – динамика ефикасног учења и наставе. Београд: Институт за педагогију и андрагогију Филозофског факултета.

10. Stradling, R. (1984). Controversial issues in the classroom. In Hill, S. and Reid C., Teaching controversial issues . London: Edward Arnold.

11. Живковић, Љ. и Јовановић, С. (2008). Модел часа активног учења у настави географије. Географски факултет Универзитета у Београду, Зборник радова 56: 257-268.

Downloads

Published

2025-10-30

How to Cite

Lazić, B. (2025). CONTROVERSIAL DISCUSSION FOR IMPROVEMENT GEOGRAPHY TEACHING. Methodology in Education: Theory and Practice, 23(2), 193–200. https://doi.org/10.5937/

Most read articles by the same author(s)